HAL 9000: Archiwum

[HAL 9000]

Mocno rozczarowujący, bo naprawdę minimalna różnica w stosunku do mojego starego wydania BD.

Metropolitan? Chodzi o "Pająka"?
Zdecydowanie warto.
https://www.hdnumerique.com/dossiers/1288-test-4k-ultra-hd-blu-ray-spider.html

(15-12-2024, 15:53)Mefisto napisał(a):  Ładny ten steel Konga.
Travolty ponoć nie warto upgradować - prawda to?

Dla mnie to steel Godzilli i tego będę się trzymał

Czy warto Travoltę?

Jak nie miałem wcześniej żadnego wydania, a mam Dolby Vision i "Staying Alive":


To warto, zwłaszcza jak cena około 10 €.

W innych przypadkach, to już każdy sam musi sobie odpowiedzieć:





Geoff D:
To say I have mixed feelings about this UHD is an understatement. The 4K transfer brings finery that no other version possesses (yes I've looked at the caps of the 2017 BD version) but also introduces problems of its own with an overly 'grain managed' appearance to a large chunk of the film. The colour is IMO appropriately understated but can feel slightly too enervated at times, though the disco scenes still zing, and while the HDR seems like a natural companion in some scenes it's a poor fit in others, reminiscent of the Friday the 13th fiasco (though nowhere near as bad). The encoding, as is sadly all too often the case with Paramount's UHDs, is of desperately poor quality on the HDR10 and all but the terminally myopic should steer clear if they're only capable of HDR10 playback. But if you can do Dobly then you're in a stronger position, you'll gain a vastly more coherent output thanks to the restorative powers of the FEL. Not perfection, no, but cohesive enough to not become a bigger distraction.

https://forum.blu-ray.com/showpost.php?p=20618678&postcount=256